|
Post by Destro on Mar 5, 2006 19:18:00 GMT -5
..would you buy them? I know I would!
|
|
|
Post by CkRtech on Mar 5, 2006 22:06:10 GMT -5
What is that like a Transformers romance novel or something?
|
|
|
Post by Destro on Mar 5, 2006 23:23:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by CkRtech on Mar 5, 2006 23:48:54 GMT -5
ahh. didn't realize they have given that such a cheesy name.
i wouldn't mind seeing a bit more artwork first, but right now I would be interested in SEEING the toys. I don't want to jump the gun and say i would by them. Most transformers toys have been cheaply made during the current era.
|
|
|
Post by Destro on Mar 6, 2006 0:02:55 GMT -5
Most transformers toys have been cheaply made during the current era. Oh, for the love of..
|
|
|
Post by Gunman_sr5 on Mar 6, 2006 0:42:02 GMT -5
Some yes. Now think back to WWI. We finaly just got Starscream. So 10 years from now it could happen. lol
|
|
|
Post by CkRtech on Mar 6, 2006 0:50:57 GMT -5
Most transformers toys have been cheaply made during the current era. Oh, for the love of.. What? You *CAN'T* even tell me that these things are even constructed as well as G1. I understand their ability to not break as much, but you will always lose this arguement on one item alone. Say it with me: DIE CAST METAL.
|
|
|
Post by Destro on Mar 6, 2006 14:19:45 GMT -5
Oh, for the love of.. What? You *CAN'T* even tell me that these things are even constructed as well as G1. I understand their ability to not break as much, but you will always lose this arguement on one item alone. Say it with me: DIE CAST METAL. I thought the argument was that the current toys are cheaply made, which is simply not true. Die cast is too expensive and limits articulation and paint chips off easier. The current toys are more kid-friendly and better articulated; imo, just as good and often better than their g1 counterparts.
|
|